11 Best Black Swimsuits That Will Turn Heads Around as You Walk
Nov 25, 2023The Best Pillows for Back Sleepers
Nov 29, 2023Turning a circle into a square is possible with this kirigami
Apr 02, 2023I Found The Best T
Apr 16, 2023Carbon Fiber Galaxy Watch Band: Durable, Comfortable, Fashionable
Jul 30, 2023Carbon
Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences
image: A, Design and electrode materials of the four SMFCs tested in this study. b, Cathode assembly. c, Experimental set-up. view more
Credit: Environmental Science and Ecotechnology
In the context of increasing energy demands and environmental concerns, renewable energy solutions are crucial for achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. Microbial electrochemical technologies, such as SMFCs, are cost-effective and environmentally friendly, making them an attractive option for green energy systems. SMFCs utilize endogenous microorganisms present in soil to convert organic matter into electricity, offering a sustainable energy source and a self-powered in situ bioremediation strategy for contaminated soils.
Cathode materials play a significant role in the performance of microbial fuel cells. In this study, researchers compared the performance of membrane-free air-cathode SMFCs using four different cathodes: carbon cloth, Pt-doped carbon cloth, graphite felt, and an innovative Fe-doped carbon nanofibers electrode. The researchers conducted electrochemical tests over extended periods, along with microbial taxonomic analyses, to assess the effect of electrode materials on biofilm formation and electrochemical performance.
In a study published in Volume 16 of the journal Environmental Science and Ecotechnology on April 2023, researchers from University of Bath revealed that Fe-doped carbon nanofibers and Pt-doped carbon cloth cathodes yielded stable performances, with peak power densities of 25.5 and 30.4 mW m−2, respectively. Graphite felt cathodes demonstrated the best electrochemical performance, with a peak power density of 87.3 mW m−2. However, they also exhibited the greatest instability.
An examination of microbial communities found differences between anodic and cathodic communities. Anodes were predominantly enriched with Geobacter and Pseudomonas species, while cathodic communities were dominated by hydrogen-producing and hydrogenotrophic bacteria. This suggests that hydrogen cycling could be a possible electron transfer mechanism. Additionally, the presence of nitrate-reducing bacteria in combination with cyclic voltammogram results indicated that microbial nitrate reduction occurred on graphite felt cathodes.
The use of innovative Fe-doped carbon nanofiber cathodes provided an electrochemical performance comparable to Pt-doped carbon cloth, offering a low-cost alternative. However, graphite felt outperformed all other electrodes tested but displayed lower reproducibility and higher mass transport losses. Microbial taxonomic profiling of the cathode biofilms revealed the presence of taxa related to oxygen reduction or involvement in utilizing alternative electron acceptors, such as nitrate.
The results of this study can guide future research on low-cost, high-performing SMFCs for practical applications in energy harvesting and bioremediation. By understanding how electrode materials influence microbial communities and electrochemical performance, researchers can accelerate the translation of SMFCs into real-world implementations.
###
References
Authors
Arpita Nandy a, Daniel Farkas b, Belén Pepió-Tárrega c, Sandra Martinez-Crespiera c, Eduard Borràs c, Claudio Avignone-Rossa b, Mirella Di Lorenzo a
Affiliations
a Department of Chemical Engineering and Centre for Biosensors, Bioelectronics & Biodevices (C3Bio), University of Bath, Claverton Down, BA2 7AY, UK
b Department of Microbial Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, GU2 7XH, UK
c LEITAT Technological Center, C/ de la Innovació, 2, 08225, Terrassa, Barcelona, Spain
Environmental Science and Ecotechnology
10.1016/j.ese.2023.100276
Not applicable
Influence of carbon-based cathodes on biofilm composition and electrochemical performance in soil microbial fuel cells
8-Apr-2023
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.
image: A, Design and electrode materials of the four SMFCs tested in this study. b, Cathode assembly. c, Experimental set-up. References Authors Affiliations Disclaimer: